<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 161 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 41,02,850 under the Customs Act, as the appellants failed to prove legal importation. However, it set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants, finding no evidence of mens rea or knowledge of smuggling. The appeals were partially allowed, confirming confiscation but dismissing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 161 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 41,02,850 under the Customs Act, as the appellants failed to prove legal importation. However, it set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants, finding no evidence of mens rea or knowledge of smuggling. The appeals were partially allowed, confirming confiscation but dismissing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>