https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796652 Redistribution and disbursement under an approved resolution plan were not restrained because an earlier appellate judgment had crystallised the admitted claim, directed the Monitoring Committee to redistribute the allocated amount, and required determination of escrowed amounts. As the challenge to those directions was pending before the Supreme Court without any stay on distribution, reconsidering the same relief through the application was considered inappropriate. The request to restrain redistribution or distribution was therefore refused. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796652 Redistribution and disbursement under an approved resolution plan were not restrained because an earlier appellate judgment had crystallised the admitted claim, directed the Monitoring Committee to redistribute the allocated amount, and required determination of escrowed amounts. As the challenge to those directions was pending before the Supreme Court without any stay on distribution, reconsidering the same relief through the application was considered inappropriate. The request to restrain redistribution or distribution was therefore refused. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796652