<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 185 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53130</link>
    <description>Where the department already knew the material facts from declarations on record, invocation of the extended limitation period was not justified and the demand was held time-barred. On that basis, the connected penalty, interest and confiscation could not survive and were set aside in favour of the assessee. The stated principle is that knowledge of the relevant facts by the department defeats the proviso for extended limitation, and consequential penal and confiscatory proceedings fall with the underlying demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:23:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 185 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53130</link>
      <description>Where the department already knew the material facts from declarations on record, invocation of the extended limitation period was not justified and the demand was held time-barred. On that basis, the connected penalty, interest and confiscation could not survive and were set aside in favour of the assessee. The stated principle is that knowledge of the relevant facts by the department defeats the proviso for extended limitation, and consequential penal and confiscatory proceedings fall with the underlying demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>