https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796662 Writ jurisdiction requires credible material indicating cognisable wrongdoing or abuse of official power before an independent investigation into alleged Customs corruption may be sought; administrative delay and unsubstantiated suspicion are insufficient. Claims for compensation arising from delayed import clearance may involve disputed questions on loss, causation and responsibility, requiring adjudication before a competent civil court or other appropriate forum rather than under Article 226. Import, fiscal and administrative policy formulation remains within the legislative and executive domain, and writ jurisdiction cannot compel creation of a specified regulatory framework or departmental-delay penalty mechanism without a statutory or constitutional obligation. en-us Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796662 Writ jurisdiction requires credible material indicating cognisable wrongdoing or abuse of official power before an independent investigation into alleged Customs corruption may be sought; administrative delay and unsubstantiated suspicion are insufficient. Claims for compensation arising from delayed import clearance may involve disputed questions on loss, causation and responsibility, requiring adjudication before a competent civil court or other appropriate forum rather than under Article 226. Import, fiscal and administrative policy formulation remains within the legislative and executive domain, and writ jurisdiction cannot compel creation of a specified regulatory framework or departmental-delay penalty mechanism without a statutory or constitutional obligation. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796662