https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796665 Separate show-cause notices retained independent legal character despite arising from a common investigation, being assigned to the same adjudicating authority, and being heard together. A stay expressly limited to proceedings under one notice could not, by implication, prevent adjudication under the other notice. Challenges alleging denial of hearing, non-supply of relied-upon material, adjournments, evidentiary errors, and defects in adjudication were required to be pursued through the effective statutory appellate remedy, with no exceptional basis for writ intervention. Limitation, Call Book, extension, and communication issues concerning the still-pending notice were left to the adjudicating authority, which must provide an effective hearing before finalising proceedings. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796665 Separate show-cause notices retained independent legal character despite arising from a common investigation, being assigned to the same adjudicating authority, and being heard together. A stay expressly limited to proceedings under one notice could not, by implication, prevent adjudication under the other notice. Challenges alleging denial of hearing, non-supply of relied-upon material, adjournments, evidentiary errors, and defects in adjudication were required to be pursued through the effective statutory appellate remedy, with no exceptional basis for writ intervention. Limitation, Call Book, extension, and communication issues concerning the still-pending notice were left to the adjudicating authority, which must provide an effective hearing before finalising proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796665