<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 541 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796668</link>
    <description>Alleged client code modification in commodity pair trades cannot support an unexplained cash credit addition where the disputed gross purchase amount is not credited in the assessee&#039;s books. As each purchase had a corresponding sale or vice versa, only the resulting profit or loss could be relevant. The broker stated that modifications were operational and made without the assessee&#039;s instruction or knowledge, while Revenue did not identify the relevant transactions, prove the assessee&#039;s involvement, or establish any positive gain. Reliance solely on an investigation report was therefore insufficient to treat the amount as unexplained cash credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 541 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796668</link>
      <description>Alleged client code modification in commodity pair trades cannot support an unexplained cash credit addition where the disputed gross purchase amount is not credited in the assessee&#039;s books. As each purchase had a corresponding sale or vice versa, only the resulting profit or loss could be relevant. The broker stated that modifications were operational and made without the assessee&#039;s instruction or knowledge, while Revenue did not identify the relevant transactions, prove the assessee&#039;s involvement, or establish any positive gain. Reliance solely on an investigation report was therefore insufficient to treat the amount as unexplained cash credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>