<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 546 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796673</link>
    <description>A valid assessment requires a notice under section 143(2) from the Assessing Officer holding jurisdiction. Where the original notice was issued by another officer, the officer completing the assessment must either issue a fresh notice or establish a valid jurisdictional transfer through an order under section 127 or CBDT transfer. Absence of a notice from the jurisdictional Assessing Officer is a mandatory jurisdictional defect and cannot be cured. The assessment was therefore treated as without jurisdiction and quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 546 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796673</link>
      <description>A valid assessment requires a notice under section 143(2) from the Assessing Officer holding jurisdiction. Where the original notice was issued by another officer, the officer completing the assessment must either issue a fresh notice or establish a valid jurisdictional transfer through an order under section 127 or CBDT transfer. Absence of a notice from the jurisdictional Assessing Officer is a mandatory jurisdictional defect and cannot be cured. The assessment was therefore treated as without jurisdiction and quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>