<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 562 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796689</link>
    <description>Reliable contemporaneous records of share purchases and sales, including broker documentation, banking entries, demat statements and stock-exchange transactions, cannot be displaced solely by general investigation material concerning penny-stock transactions. In the absence of cogent evidence linking the assessee to price manipulation, accommodation entries or sham dealings, the article states that the unexplained cash credit addition was deleted. It further states that estimated commission expenditure lacked independent evidentiary support and, being consequential to the failed allegation regarding sale proceeds, was also deleted. The deletion of both additions was sustained for both assessment years on the same facts and legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 562 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796689</link>
      <description>Reliable contemporaneous records of share purchases and sales, including broker documentation, banking entries, demat statements and stock-exchange transactions, cannot be displaced solely by general investigation material concerning penny-stock transactions. In the absence of cogent evidence linking the assessee to price manipulation, accommodation entries or sham dealings, the article states that the unexplained cash credit addition was deleted. It further states that estimated commission expenditure lacked independent evidentiary support and, being consequential to the failed allegation regarding sale proceeds, was also deleted. The deletion of both additions was sustained for both assessment years on the same facts and legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>