<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 567 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796694</link>
    <description>Retrospective expansion of taxability for offshore technical-service payments under Section 9(1)(vii) cannot displace relief available under the law in force when the payments were made. The Finance Act, 2010 Explanation removed the requirement that services be rendered in India and substantively widened the charging provision; it therefore operates prospectively where retrospective application would create a fresh tax liability or remove vested benefits. A later legislative amendment does not justify review of a concluded decision. Treaty protection under Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA remains available where more beneficial under Section 90(2), and withdrawal of beneficial Board circulars operates prospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 567 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796694</link>
      <description>Retrospective expansion of taxability for offshore technical-service payments under Section 9(1)(vii) cannot displace relief available under the law in force when the payments were made. The Finance Act, 2010 Explanation removed the requirement that services be rendered in India and substantively widened the charging provision; it therefore operates prospectively where retrospective application would create a fresh tax liability or remove vested benefits. A later legislative amendment does not justify review of a concluded decision. Treaty protection under Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA remains available where more beneficial under Section 90(2), and withdrawal of beneficial Board circulars operates prospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>