<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2047 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470772</link>
    <description>Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is described as requiring a meaningful pre-cognizance opportunity for a proposed accused in a private complaint, including access to complaint materials and consideration of objections before process is issued. The text distinguishes this notice from post-cognizance summons and states that later objections cannot cure a reversed sequence. Where the proposed accused resides outside territorial jurisdiction, Section 225 is presented as requiring postponement of process and inquiry into jurisdiction, publication, consequences and parallel proceedings. It also highlights strict procedural safeguards where criminal defamation concerns political criticism of official action, while leaving merits and defences open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 18:53:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2047 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470772</link>
      <description>Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is described as requiring a meaningful pre-cognizance opportunity for a proposed accused in a private complaint, including access to complaint materials and consideration of objections before process is issued. The text distinguishes this notice from post-cognizance summons and states that later objections cannot cure a reversed sequence. Where the proposed accused resides outside territorial jurisdiction, Section 225 is presented as requiring postponement of process and inquiry into jurisdiction, publication, consequences and parallel proceedings. It also highlights strict procedural safeguards where criminal defamation concerns political criticism of official action, while leaving merits and defences open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>