https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470773 Multiple FIRs arising from the same occurrence or transaction require a single comprehensive investigation; additional material should be addressed through further investigation and supplementary reports rather than parallel proceedings. Applying this principle to allegations concerning homebuyer payments, non-delivery of properties and alleged fund diversion, the Delhi EOW FIR was directed to be transferred and clubbed with the Haryana FIR for investigation in accordance with law. A blanket prospective restraint on coercive action in respect of future FIRs was not considered legally permissible; any future FIR remains subject to remedies available under law. en-us Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2026 18:53:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470773 Multiple FIRs arising from the same occurrence or transaction require a single comprehensive investigation; additional material should be addressed through further investigation and supplementary reports rather than parallel proceedings. Applying this principle to allegations concerning homebuyer payments, non-delivery of properties and alleged fund diversion, the Delhi EOW FIR was directed to be transferred and clubbed with the Haryana FIR for investigation in accordance with law. A blanket prospective restraint on coercive action in respect of future FIRs was not considered legally permissible; any future FIR remains subject to remedies available under law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470773