<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1848 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470774</link>
    <description>Construction of residential complex services rendered by a builder or authorised person became taxable only from 1 July 2010; therefore, no service tax was payable for the disputed pre-taxability period and the demand was unsustainable. A demand also could not be confirmed under the statutory provision for confirmation when the show cause notice had not invoked the prerequisite demand provision, as this exceeded the notice&#039;s scope. The service-tax demand and consequential interest and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 18:53:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1848 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470774</link>
      <description>Construction of residential complex services rendered by a builder or authorised person became taxable only from 1 July 2010; therefore, no service tax was payable for the disputed pre-taxability period and the demand was unsustainable. A demand also could not be confirmed under the statutory provision for confirmation when the show cause notice had not invoked the prerequisite demand provision, as this exceeded the notice&#039;s scope. The service-tax demand and consequential interest and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>