<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 118 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53124</link>
    <description>Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 was applied to multi-piece packages whose aggregate net content did not exceed the prescribed limit, so the packages were exempt from mandatory MRP declaration. On that basis, Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not attracted because valuation on retail sale price basis depends on a statutory requirement to declare retail sale price on the package. The Board circular relied on by Revenue could not override the plain wording of the rule, and the earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own matter was followed. Valuation under Section 4 therefore remained applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 118 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53124</link>
      <description>Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 was applied to multi-piece packages whose aggregate net content did not exceed the prescribed limit, so the packages were exempt from mandatory MRP declaration. On that basis, Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not attracted because valuation on retail sale price basis depends on a statutory requirement to declare retail sale price on the package. The Board circular relied on by Revenue could not override the plain wording of the rule, and the earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own matter was followed. Valuation under Section 4 therefore remained applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>