<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470767</link>
    <description>Interconnected acts of supplying inferior timber, procuring false inspection certificates and submitting multiple bills under one contract may form a single cheating charge where they further one conspiracy and criminal object; separate charges are not required merely because payments arose from individual bills. Partners may be charged where bills were submitted for the firm in furtherance of the common conspiracy. A corruption charge is not invalid solely because the prosecution sanction does not expressly allege personal pecuniary gain, as the factual basis for gain may be proved at trial. A court trying conspiracy may also try cheating and abetment committed pursuant to that conspiracy outside its territorial jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470767</link>
      <description>Interconnected acts of supplying inferior timber, procuring false inspection certificates and submitting multiple bills under one contract may form a single cheating charge where they further one conspiracy and criminal object; separate charges are not required merely because payments arose from individual bills. Partners may be charged where bills were submitted for the firm in furtherance of the common conspiracy. A corruption charge is not invalid solely because the prosecution sanction does not expressly allege personal pecuniary gain, as the factual basis for gain may be proved at trial. A court trying conspiracy may also try cheating and abetment committed pursuant to that conspiracy outside its territorial jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>