<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1660 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470766</link>
    <description>Reassessment may be initiated on fresh tangible material indicating possible escaped income, where statutory notices communicate the substance of recorded reasons, objections are considered, and approval requirements are met. However, an outstanding letter-of-credit liability cannot be treated as unexplained expenditure where banks directly disbursed the underlying funds to vendors. Allegations of bogus purchases or diversion of bank funds do not, by themselves, make the expenditure&#039;s source unexplained. The article further notes that the special tax treatment linked to unexplained expenditure cannot apply when that statutory basis fails. A natural-justice challenge consequential to an unsuccessful reassessment challenge requires no separate substantive determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1660 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470766</link>
      <description>Reassessment may be initiated on fresh tangible material indicating possible escaped income, where statutory notices communicate the substance of recorded reasons, objections are considered, and approval requirements are met. However, an outstanding letter-of-credit liability cannot be treated as unexplained expenditure where banks directly disbursed the underlying funds to vendors. Allegations of bogus purchases or diversion of bank funds do not, by themselves, make the expenditure&#039;s source unexplained. The article further notes that the special tax treatment linked to unexplained expenditure cannot apply when that statutory basis fails. A natural-justice challenge consequential to an unsuccessful reassessment challenge requires no separate substantive determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>