https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470763 The pre-2024 restriction under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 limited initiation of conversion proceedings to an aggrieved person or specified relatives, barring complaints by unrelated informants. FIRs based on defective initiation, unreliable replicated materials, or later complaints intended to cure defects were quashed. Article 32 jurisdiction could be exercised exceptionally where criminal process palpably abused liberty despite an alternative High Court remedy. Later FIRs arising from the same occurrence were impermissible unless they qualified as a genuine counter-case or distinct occurrence. Separate Indian Penal Code allegations, including attempted murder, extortion and intentional insult, required further consideration where the complete record was unavailable. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2026 12:53:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470763 The pre-2024 restriction under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 limited initiation of conversion proceedings to an aggrieved person or specified relatives, barring complaints by unrelated informants. FIRs based on defective initiation, unreliable replicated materials, or later complaints intended to cure defects were quashed. Article 32 jurisdiction could be exercised exceptionally where criminal process palpably abused liberty despite an alternative High Court remedy. Later FIRs arising from the same occurrence were impermissible unless they qualified as a genuine counter-case or distinct occurrence. Separate Indian Penal Code allegations, including attempted murder, extortion and intentional insult, required further consideration where the complete record was unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470763