https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796540 Article 32 jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings is extraordinary and ordinarily requires a demonstrated fundamental-right violation or exceptional circumstances warranting direct constitutional intervention. Assertions of absence from the country, lack of knowledge of transactions, or misuse of a bank account do not by themselves justify bypassing remedies before the High Court. Multiple FIRs may be clubbed only when they arise from the same incident or connected acts forming one transaction, assessed through sameness, unity of purpose, proximity, and continuity. Distinct complainants, victims, occasions, transactions, and consequences support separate investigations despite a similar modus operandi or funds reaching one account. en-us Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796540 Article 32 jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings is extraordinary and ordinarily requires a demonstrated fundamental-right violation or exceptional circumstances warranting direct constitutional intervention. Assertions of absence from the country, lack of knowledge of transactions, or misuse of a bank account do not by themselves justify bypassing remedies before the High Court. Multiple FIRs may be clubbed only when they arise from the same incident or connected acts forming one transaction, assessed through sameness, unity of purpose, proximity, and continuity. Distinct complainants, victims, occasions, transactions, and consequences support separate investigations despite a similar modus operandi or funds reaching one account. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796540