https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796562 Challenges to seizure of gold and pending customs show-cause proceedings were left for statutory adjudication rather than determined in writ jurisdiction. The Additional Commissioner of Customs was identified as the available forum to determine the parties' competing claims. No view was expressed on the legality of the seizure, the show-cause notice, or the merits. Petitioners were directed to place further material before the customs authority and participate in proceedings, which must conclude by a reasoned order after a fair hearing. The writ petitions were kept pending and adjourned sine die until adjudication is completed. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796562 Challenges to seizure of gold and pending customs show-cause proceedings were left for statutory adjudication rather than determined in writ jurisdiction. The Additional Commissioner of Customs was identified as the available forum to determine the parties' competing claims. No view was expressed on the legality of the seizure, the show-cause notice, or the merits. Petitioners were directed to place further material before the customs authority and participate in proceedings, which must conclude by a reasoned order after a fair hearing. The writ petitions were kept pending and adjourned sine die until adjudication is completed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796562