<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796598</link>
    <description>Eligible commercial vehicles qualified for higher depreciation under the applicable schedule, and a scientifically computed, consistently applied warranty provision linked to sales constituted a present business liability deductible in computing income. Research and development expenditure under section 35(2AB) required limited verification of the difference between DSIR-approved and claimed expenditure before allowance under the earlier precedent. Section 14A read with Rule 8D could not disallow expenditure for investments producing no exempt income; sufficient interest-free funds supported the presumption that income-yielding investments were funded from those sources. Deduction under section 80JJAA remained allowable consistently with earlier years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796598</link>
      <description>Eligible commercial vehicles qualified for higher depreciation under the applicable schedule, and a scientifically computed, consistently applied warranty provision linked to sales constituted a present business liability deductible in computing income. Research and development expenditure under section 35(2AB) required limited verification of the difference between DSIR-approved and claimed expenditure before allowance under the earlier precedent. Section 14A read with Rule 8D could not disallow expenditure for investments producing no exempt income; sufficient interest-free funds supported the presumption that income-yielding investments were funded from those sources. Deduction under section 80JJAA remained allowable consistently with earlier years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>