<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 196 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53111</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that plastic caps supplied with plastic tubes for toothpaste packaging are accessories and not integral parts, following precedents that accessories should not be included in the assessable value for duty purposes. The decision set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, rejecting the proposal to add the cost of caps to the assessable value of the tubes, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 196 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53111</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that plastic caps supplied with plastic tubes for toothpaste packaging are accessories and not integral parts, following precedents that accessories should not be included in the assessable value for duty purposes. The decision set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, rejecting the proposal to add the cost of caps to the assessable value of the tubes, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>