<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 488 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796615</link>
    <description>Reliance on a District Valuation Officer&#039;s report following rejection of books of account is discussed in relation to the appropriate valuation benchmark. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) faulted the valuation method used by the District Valuation Officer, while not questioning the procedure of obtaining the valuation report. The text states that valuation should be based on State PWD rates rather than CPWD rates and records dismissal of the Special Leave Petition without interference with the High Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 488 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796615</link>
      <description>Reliance on a District Valuation Officer&#039;s report following rejection of books of account is discussed in relation to the appropriate valuation benchmark. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) faulted the valuation method used by the District Valuation Officer, while not questioning the procedure of obtaining the valuation report. The text states that valuation should be based on State PWD rates rather than CPWD rates and records dismissal of the Special Leave Petition without interference with the High Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>