<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 489 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796616</link>
    <description>Reasonable apprehension of bias can invalidate a collective selection process even without proof of actual prejudice. Participation in the Search-cum-Selection Committee by an officer who had faced contempt proceedings initiated by the candidate in the same service dispute created a genuine concern about impartiality. The relevant record also indicated prior departmental actions affecting the candidate&#039;s prospects. The rejection of candidature for appointment as Member (Accountant), ITAT was set aside, and fresh consideration was required by a reconstituted Selection Committee excluding the concerned officer, with the outcome to be communicated to the candidate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 489 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796616</link>
      <description>Reasonable apprehension of bias can invalidate a collective selection process even without proof of actual prejudice. Participation in the Search-cum-Selection Committee by an officer who had faced contempt proceedings initiated by the candidate in the same service dispute created a genuine concern about impartiality. The relevant record also indicated prior departmental actions affecting the candidate&#039;s prospects. The rejection of candidature for appointment as Member (Accountant), ITAT was set aside, and fresh consideration was required by a reconstituted Selection Committee excluding the concerned officer, with the outcome to be communicated to the candidate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>