<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 161 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112 of the Customs Act for non-fulfillment of export obligations due to economic crisis. The Tribunal ruled that in cases where there is no mens rea to evade duty by not fulfilling obligations, the penalty under Section 112 is not applicable. The impugned order was modified solely to that extent, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:06:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 161 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112 of the Customs Act for non-fulfillment of export obligations due to economic crisis. The Tribunal ruled that in cases where there is no mens rea to evade duty by not fulfilling obligations, the penalty under Section 112 is not applicable. The impugned order was modified solely to that extent, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>