https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796623 GST demands founded on alleged fraudulent registration and identity theft should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy where impersonation, forgery and use of identity documents require assessment of disputed facts and evidence. Writ jurisdiction is unsuitable for re-evaluating findings already considered by the adjudicating authority, while the identity-theft investigation remains subject to the competent criminal court's supervision. The petitioners were directed to pursue the statutory appeal and could seek exclusion of time spent in writ proceedings for limitation purposes. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796623 GST demands founded on alleged fraudulent registration and identity theft should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy where impersonation, forgery and use of identity documents require assessment of disputed facts and evidence. Writ jurisdiction is unsuitable for re-evaluating findings already considered by the adjudicating authority, while the identity-theft investigation remains subject to the competent criminal court's supervision. The petitioners were directed to pursue the statutory appeal and could seek exclusion of time spent in writ proceedings for limitation purposes. Case-Laws GST Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796623