https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796625 Disputed denial of input tax credit, interest and penalty required factual verification of ERP software existence and use, and of the underlying transaction's genuineness. Because those matters had not been tested and a statutory appellate remedy was available, writ jurisdiction was not appropriate for resolving the controversy. The party was permitted to file a statutory appeal within 30 days without pre-deposit, and the appellate authority was directed to decide it on merits within three months. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796625 Disputed denial of input tax credit, interest and penalty required factual verification of ERP software existence and use, and of the underlying transaction's genuineness. Because those matters had not been tested and a statutory appellate remedy was available, writ jurisdiction was not appropriate for resolving the controversy. The party was permitted to file a statutory appeal within 30 days without pre-deposit, and the appellate authority was directed to decide it on merits within three months. Case-Laws GST Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796625