<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 499 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796626</link>
    <description>Ex parte GST assessment and rejection of a delayed statutory appeal required reconsideration because the assessee asserted that the disputed tax had already been paid, but the payment was not reflected in the assessment. Verification of the asserted payment was necessary. Fresh adjudication was directed after the assessee deposits 15% of the disputed tax through the Electronic Credit Ledger and files a reply supported by relevant documents. The assessment and appeal-rejection orders were quashed and the matter remitted subject to those conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 499 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796626</link>
      <description>Ex parte GST assessment and rejection of a delayed statutory appeal required reconsideration because the assessee asserted that the disputed tax had already been paid, but the payment was not reflected in the assessment. Verification of the asserted payment was necessary. Fresh adjudication was directed after the assessee deposits 15% of the disputed tax through the Electronic Credit Ledger and files a reply supported by relevant documents. The assessment and appeal-rejection orders were quashed and the matter remitted subject to those conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>