<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 502 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796629</link>
    <description>Section 107 prescribes a three-month period for filing a statutory appeal and permits a further month where sufficient cause is shown, creating an aggregate 120-day period. The notes state that, despite filing four days beyond that period, condonation was considered expedient because the assessment order affected valuable rights of the assessee. The appellate dismissal was set aside and the appeal was restored for adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 502 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796629</link>
      <description>Section 107 prescribes a three-month period for filing a statutory appeal and permits a further month where sufficient cause is shown, creating an aggregate 120-day period. The notes state that, despite filing four days beyond that period, condonation was considered expedient because the assessment order affected valuable rights of the assessee. The appellate dismissal was set aside and the appeal was restored for adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>