<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 510 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796637</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an appealable GST adjudication order is not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the CGST Act. The asserted denial of relied-upon documents did not justify bypassing that remedy because no supporting particulars or prejudice were shown, while the record indicated electronic supply of the show-cause notice and relied-upon documents and a response to the hearing notice. No exceptional circumstance was established. The merits of the tax demand and the parties&#039; substantive contentions were not examined, and the petitioner was required to pursue the statutory appeal within the permitted period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 510 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796637</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an appealable GST adjudication order is not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the CGST Act. The asserted denial of relied-upon documents did not justify bypassing that remedy because no supporting particulars or prejudice were shown, while the record indicated electronic supply of the show-cause notice and relied-upon documents and a response to the hearing notice. No exceptional circumstance was established. The merits of the tax demand and the parties&#039; substantive contentions were not examined, and the petitioner was required to pursue the statutory appeal within the permitted period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>