<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 160 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53107</link>
    <description>Excess duty paid cannot be adjusted by an assessee through suo motu credit outside the prescribed refund mechanism; the statutory refund procedure must be followed before any credit is taken. The Tribunal held that bypassing the refund claim process was impermissible, and the order confirming duty, penalty and interest was consistent with the statutory framework. The contrary view of the Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:04:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 160 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53107</link>
      <description>Excess duty paid cannot be adjusted by an assessee through suo motu credit outside the prescribed refund mechanism; the statutory refund procedure must be followed before any credit is taken. The Tribunal held that bypassing the refund claim process was impermissible, and the order confirming duty, penalty and interest was consistent with the statutory framework. The contrary view of the Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>