<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1987 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470740</link>
    <description>Second FIRs are barred where they concern the same incident, offence, or transaction already under investigation. A subsequent FIR remains permissible if it presents a rival version, concerns a separate incident, has a distinct scope, or reveals newly discovered facts or a wider conspiracy. Where an earlier FIR alleged a specific bribe demand and acceptance, a later FIR alleging an extensive corruption conspiracy involving multiple persons, transactions, and communications over time had a materially broader and distinct scope. The subsequent FIR was therefore maintainable, the quashing order was set aside, and investigation was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1987 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470740</link>
      <description>Second FIRs are barred where they concern the same incident, offence, or transaction already under investigation. A subsequent FIR remains permissible if it presents a rival version, concerns a separate incident, has a distinct scope, or reveals newly discovered facts or a wider conspiracy. Where an earlier FIR alleged a specific bribe demand and acceptance, a later FIR alleging an extensive corruption conspiracy involving multiple persons, transactions, and communications over time had a materially broader and distinct scope. The subsequent FIR was therefore maintainable, the quashing order was set aside, and investigation was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>