<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2203 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470744</link>
    <description>Unexplained money addition was sustained because the assessee failed to comply with remand directions requiring proof that specified concerns and their bank accounts were not used for accommodation entries, production of their real owners, and substantiation of the nature and recorded status of bank balances. No material was produced to rebut the lower authorities&#039; findings or explain the seized cash and related amounts. The addition therefore remained sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 19:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2203 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470744</link>
      <description>Unexplained money addition was sustained because the assessee failed to comply with remand directions requiring proof that specified concerns and their bank accounts were not used for accommodation entries, production of their real owners, and substantiation of the nature and recorded status of bank balances. No material was produced to rebut the lower authorities&#039; findings or explain the seized cash and related amounts. The addition therefore remained sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>