<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470748</link>
    <description>Unexplained-money additions require the Assessing Officer to test a prima facie source explanation through independent enquiry and establish that the assessee owned unexplained funds. Cash advances linked to notarised, unregistered land-sale and purchase agreements could not be treated as unexplained money where the explanation was supported by agreements, cancellation and return of an advance, and was not rebutted by evidence. Unexplained-investment additions likewise require proof that an investment was actually made; an addition based on an incorrect computation and an unsupported assumption, without evidence of property transfer or payment, cannot stand. The impugned additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 19:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470748</link>
      <description>Unexplained-money additions require the Assessing Officer to test a prima facie source explanation through independent enquiry and establish that the assessee owned unexplained funds. Cash advances linked to notarised, unregistered land-sale and purchase agreements could not be treated as unexplained money where the explanation was supported by agreements, cancellation and return of an advance, and was not rebutted by evidence. Unexplained-investment additions likewise require proof that an investment was actually made; an addition based on an incorrect computation and an unsupported assumption, without evidence of property transfer or payment, cannot stand. The impugned additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>