https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470736 Order XXXIX Rule 1(b) CPC permits interim restraint over a guarantor's undisclosed assets, including assets outside the suit schedule, where contractual disclosure and preservation obligations are breached and there is a risk of dissipation. The notes state that failure to disclose asset particulars cannot defeat protective relief when the guarantor controls that information. They further state that a Commercial Court may exercise prima facie jurisdiction over personal guarantee and negative-lien obligations where defendants reside within its territorial jurisdiction. Pre-institution mediation under the Commercial Courts Act is not mandatory where the suit seeks urgent interim protection against alienation of assets. en-us Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:07:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470736 Order XXXIX Rule 1(b) CPC permits interim restraint over a guarantor's undisclosed assets, including assets outside the suit schedule, where contractual disclosure and preservation obligations are breached and there is a risk of dissipation. The notes state that failure to disclose asset particulars cannot defeat protective relief when the guarantor controls that information. They further state that a Commercial Court may exercise prima facie jurisdiction over personal guarantee and negative-lien obligations where defendants reside within its territorial jurisdiction. Pre-institution mediation under the Commercial Courts Act is not mandatory where the suit seeks urgent interim protection against alienation of assets. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470736