<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1534 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470737</link>
    <description>Article 342 confines the specification, inclusion and exclusion of Scheduled Tribes to the constitutional process involving the President and Parliament. The notes state that a State executive notification cannot extend Scheduled Tribe certificates or consequential benefits to the Lohar community by relying on repeal of a prior amendment, particularly where Lohar is distinct from the listed Lohara and Lohra communities. Such executive action is described as arbitrary under Article 14 and inconsistent with binding law. The material also addresses Article 32 maintainability where personal liberty is affected and discusses costs as monetary redress for constitutional infringement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1534 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470737</link>
      <description>Article 342 confines the specification, inclusion and exclusion of Scheduled Tribes to the constitutional process involving the President and Parliament. The notes state that a State executive notification cannot extend Scheduled Tribe certificates or consequential benefits to the Lohar community by relying on repeal of a prior amendment, particularly where Lohar is distinct from the listed Lohara and Lohra communities. Such executive action is described as arbitrary under Article 14 and inconsistent with binding law. The material also addresses Article 32 maintainability where personal liberty is affected and discusses costs as monetary redress for constitutional infringement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>