<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 154 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) due to lack of jurisdiction, emphasizing the adjudicating authority becoming functus officio after the original order. The Tribunal found no concrete evidence implicating the appellant in collusion with the shipping transport company, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and any consequential relief as permitted by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 154 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) due to lack of jurisdiction, emphasizing the adjudicating authority becoming functus officio after the original order. The Tribunal found no concrete evidence implicating the appellant in collusion with the shipping transport company, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and any consequential relief as permitted by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>