<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 321 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796448</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 54(1)(14) cannot be sustained solely because columns 7 and 8 of Form 38 were left blank during transit of goods. Incomplete Form 38 entries, without additional material, do not justify an adverse inference against the dealer. The note states that established decisions governed the issue and supports the assessee&#039;s position that unfilled columns alone are insufficient for imposing penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 321 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796448</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 54(1)(14) cannot be sustained solely because columns 7 and 8 of Form 38 were left blank during transit of goods. Incomplete Form 38 entries, without additional material, do not justify an adverse inference against the dealer. The note states that established decisions governed the issue and supports the assessee&#039;s position that unfilled columns alone are insufficient for imposing penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>