<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 321 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796448</link>
    <description>Penalty for incomplete transit documentation cannot rest solely on blank columns 7 and 8 of Form 38. Incomplete entries, without additional material indicating a contravention, do not justify an adverse inference against the dealer. Penalty under Section 54(1)(14) is therefore unsustainable where the only alleged defect is the failure to fill those columns, and the issue stands resolved in favour of the assessee rather than the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 321 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796448</link>
      <description>Penalty for incomplete transit documentation cannot rest solely on blank columns 7 and 8 of Form 38. Incomplete entries, without additional material indicating a contravention, do not justify an adverse inference against the dealer. Penalty under Section 54(1)(14) is therefore unsustainable where the only alleged defect is the failure to fill those columns, and the issue stands resolved in favour of the assessee rather than the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>