https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796451 Article 226 jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable for recovery of a differential tax amount withheld under a private construction contract when the agreement contains an operative arbitration clause. The payment dispute remains within private contractual law, and, where arbitration has already been invoked, the claim for the deducted amount must be pursued before the arbitrator. Entitlement to the differential tax amount remains for arbitral adjudication rather than determination through a public-law remedy. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796451 Article 226 jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable for recovery of a differential tax amount withheld under a private construction contract when the agreement contains an operative arbitration clause. The payment dispute remains within private contractual law, and, where arbitration has already been invoked, the claim for the deducted amount must be pursued before the arbitrator. Entitlement to the differential tax amount remains for arbitral adjudication rather than determination through a public-law remedy. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796451