https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796463 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to challenge a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is confined to exceptional cases of patent arbitrariness, mala fides, or manifest lack of jurisdiction where statutory adjudication and appellate remedies are available. A pre-registered predicate case is not indispensable for attachment under the Act where the order refers to FIRs alleging cheating, a scheduled offence, and information has been transmitted to the jurisdictional police. Objections to overseas advertisements and the quantification of proceeds of crime involve disputed facts and must be examined through the statutory process. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796463 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to challenge a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is confined to exceptional cases of patent arbitrariness, mala fides, or manifest lack of jurisdiction where statutory adjudication and appellate remedies are available. A pre-registered predicate case is not indispensable for attachment under the Act where the order refers to FIRs alleging cheating, a scheduled offence, and information has been transmitted to the jurisdictional police. Objections to overseas advertisements and the quantification of proceeds of crime involve disputed facts and must be examined through the statutory process. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796463