<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 361 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796488</link>
    <description>Revision under section 23 of the Black Money Act requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue, including where mandatory inquiries or verification were omitted. The article notes that the assessment record contained repeated inquiries into the discretionary trust, trustee minutes, distributions, foreign assets and bank accounts, with explanations and compliance-scheme declarations already considered. Material relied on for revision had been examined during assessment, and no falsity or specific inquiry defect was identified. Reconsideration based only on a different possible view or alleged inadequacy of inquiry could not support revision. The assessment was therefore neither erroneous nor prejudicial, rendering the revision invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 361 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796488</link>
      <description>Revision under section 23 of the Black Money Act requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue, including where mandatory inquiries or verification were omitted. The article notes that the assessment record contained repeated inquiries into the discretionary trust, trustee minutes, distributions, foreign assets and bank accounts, with explanations and compliance-scheme declarations already considered. Material relied on for revision had been examined during assessment, and no falsity or specific inquiry defect was identified. Reconsideration based only on a different possible view or alleged inadequacy of inquiry could not support revision. The assessment was therefore neither erroneous nor prejudicial, rendering the revision invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>