<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 363 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796490</link>
    <description>Difference between an assessee&#039;s total personal capital and capital recorded in a partnership firm cannot be treated as unexplained credit merely through an incorrect comparison. Opening capital was reflected in returns for earlier assessment years, while the increase during the relevant year was supported by disclosed partnership profit share, remuneration and other recorded receipts. As no material rebutted the continuity and source of the capital, the addition under Section 68 was unsustainable and stood deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 363 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796490</link>
      <description>Difference between an assessee&#039;s total personal capital and capital recorded in a partnership firm cannot be treated as unexplained credit merely through an incorrect comparison. Opening capital was reflected in returns for earlier assessment years, while the increase during the relevant year was supported by disclosed partnership profit share, remuneration and other recorded receipts. As no material rebutted the continuity and source of the capital, the addition under Section 68 was unsustainable and stood deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>