<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 374 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796501</link>
    <description>An appeal must be filed before the Tribunal Bench having territorial jurisdiction over the appellant&#039;s registered office. As the registered office fell within the Cuttack Bench&#039;s jurisdiction, filing before the Hyderabad Bench was not maintainable. No statutory provision permitted the Hyderabad Bench or its Registry to transfer the appeal to the competent Bench. The stated delay was also unsupported by sufficient cause for condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 374 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796501</link>
      <description>An appeal must be filed before the Tribunal Bench having territorial jurisdiction over the appellant&#039;s registered office. As the registered office fell within the Cuttack Bench&#039;s jurisdiction, filing before the Hyderabad Bench was not maintainable. No statutory provision permitted the Hyderabad Bench or its Registry to transfer the appeal to the competent Bench. The stated delay was also unsupported by sufficient cause for condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>