<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 150 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53086</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty under the notification was read as extending to compact fluorescent lamps classifiable under Chapter 85, including incomplete, unfinished, unassembled or disassembled goods that still satisfied the tariff rules for CFLs. The interpretative rules were treated as integral to classification, so goods meeting those criteria could fall within the levy. Mere parts of CFLs, however, would not be covered unless the notification reached them. Because the importers claimed the goods were only parts and the coverage of pin-type CFLs required factual and technical reconsideration, fresh adjudication was considered necessary on the nature of the imported goods and the notification&#039;s scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 150 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53086</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty under the notification was read as extending to compact fluorescent lamps classifiable under Chapter 85, including incomplete, unfinished, unassembled or disassembled goods that still satisfied the tariff rules for CFLs. The interpretative rules were treated as integral to classification, so goods meeting those criteria could fall within the levy. Mere parts of CFLs, however, would not be covered unless the notification reached them. Because the importers claimed the goods were only parts and the coverage of pin-type CFLs required factual and technical reconsideration, fresh adjudication was considered necessary on the nature of the imported goods and the notification&#039;s scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>