<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 397 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796524</link>
    <description>Section 69C requires the taxpayer to fail to explain the source of expenditure or provide an unsatisfactory explanation. Documentary material such as stock statements, tax assessment records, purchaser details, sales confirmations and recovery proceedings supported the letters of credit transactions. The notes state that treating transactions as accommodation entries, without independent inquiry, document verification, examination of beneficiary entities or cogent contrary evidence, does not establish unexplained expenditure. Bank-funded encashment of letters of credit may also demonstrate the stated source. On this analysis, addition of outstanding letters of credit under Section 69C and consequential taxation under Section 115BBE were described as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 397 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796524</link>
      <description>Section 69C requires the taxpayer to fail to explain the source of expenditure or provide an unsatisfactory explanation. Documentary material such as stock statements, tax assessment records, purchaser details, sales confirmations and recovery proceedings supported the letters of credit transactions. The notes state that treating transactions as accommodation entries, without independent inquiry, document verification, examination of beneficiary entities or cogent contrary evidence, does not establish unexplained expenditure. Bank-funded encashment of letters of credit may also demonstrate the stated source. On this analysis, addition of outstanding letters of credit under Section 69C and consequential taxation under Section 115BBE were described as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>