https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796533 Writ jurisdiction need not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appeal can examine jurisdictional objections, the fact-dependent reasonable period for issuing a notice under Section 76, and factual disputes over input tax credit and tax payment. The appellate remedy was described as comprehensive, and the adjudication followed consideration of the taxpayer's reply and an opportunity of hearing. The notes state that the writ petition was not entertained, leaving the jurisdictional, limitation-related and factual issues for statutory appellate proceedings. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796533 Writ jurisdiction need not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appeal can examine jurisdictional objections, the fact-dependent reasonable period for issuing a notice under Section 76, and factual disputes over input tax credit and tax payment. The appellate remedy was described as comprehensive, and the adjudication followed consideration of the taxpayer's reply and an opportunity of hearing. The notes state that the writ petition was not entertained, leaving the jurisdictional, limitation-related and factual issues for statutory appellate proceedings. Case-Laws GST Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796533