https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796533 Writ jurisdiction need not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appeal can examine jurisdictional objections, the reasonable period for issuing a notice under Section 76, and factual disputes over input tax credit and tax payment. The reasonable-period question depends on the facts of each matter, while the appellate remedy can also consider the applicable provision for the relevant financial years. Since the adjudication followed consideration of the reply and an opportunity of hearing, the writ petition was not entertained and the statutory appellate remedy remained available. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796533 Writ jurisdiction need not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appeal can examine jurisdictional objections, the reasonable period for issuing a notice under Section 76, and factual disputes over input tax credit and tax payment. The reasonable-period question depends on the facts of each matter, while the appellate remedy can also consider the applicable provision for the relevant financial years. Since the adjudication followed consideration of the reply and an opportunity of hearing, the writ petition was not entertained and the statutory appellate remedy remained available. Case-Laws GST Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796533