<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 408 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796535</link>
    <description>Prohibition orders sealing business premises during GST search proceedings were challenged. The writ petition was disposed of by consent without adjudication on the merits. The premises were directed to be de-sealed in the petitioner&#039;s presence, and any further search was required to proceed in accordance with the applicable statutory procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 408 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796535</link>
      <description>Prohibition orders sealing business premises during GST search proceedings were challenged. The writ petition was disposed of by consent without adjudication on the merits. The premises were directed to be de-sealed in the petitioner&#039;s presence, and any further search was required to proceed in accordance with the applicable statutory procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>