<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Asset-based escaped-income satisfaction is mandatory for extended Section 153C jurisdiction; a cash-transaction note alone invalidates the assessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102426</link>
    <description>Section 153C jurisdiction for assessment years beyond the six preceding years requires the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction that escaped income is represented by an asset. The six-year period is reckoned from the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which seized material is received by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the other person; on that basis, AY 2015-16 fell within the extended period. However, a satisfaction note referring only to alleged cash transactions did not establish the mandatory asset-representation condition. The assessment was therefore treated as void for lack of valid jurisdiction, and the consequential addition could not survive; issues concerning digital evidence, consolidated satisfaction and merits remained open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Asset-based escaped-income satisfaction is mandatory for extended Section 153C jurisdiction; a cash-transaction note alone invalidates the assessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102426</link>
      <description>Section 153C jurisdiction for assessment years beyond the six preceding years requires the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction that escaped income is represented by an asset. The six-year period is reckoned from the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which seized material is received by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the other person; on that basis, AY 2015-16 fell within the extended period. However, a satisfaction note referring only to alleged cash transactions did not establish the mandatory asset-representation condition. The assessment was therefore treated as void for lack of valid jurisdiction, and the consequential addition could not survive; issues concerning digital evidence, consolidated satisfaction and merits remained open.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>