<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Moratorium asset restoration permits consequential directions to replenish the insolvency estate despite no finding of fraudulent trading.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102413</link>
    <description>Moratorium breaches involving sale of mortgaged property and withdrawals from a corporate debtor&#039;s funds may warrant restoration to preserve the insolvency estate during CIRP. The notes state that the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s residuary jurisdiction extends to consequential directions required to protect and restore estate assets, independently of a finding of fraudulent or wrongful trading. Relief depends on the nature of the restoration sought, and unsupported claims that withdrawals were authorised do not displace the statutory moratorium and management-transfer framework. A direction to restore funds to the corporate debtor&#039;s account is described as valid consequential relief. A reference for action under an omitted provision concerning moratorium contravention is stated to be infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Moratorium asset restoration permits consequential directions to replenish the insolvency estate despite no finding of fraudulent trading.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102413</link>
      <description>Moratorium breaches involving sale of mortgaged property and withdrawals from a corporate debtor&#039;s funds may warrant restoration to preserve the insolvency estate during CIRP. The notes state that the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s residuary jurisdiction extends to consequential directions required to protect and restore estate assets, independently of a finding of fraudulent or wrongful trading. Relief depends on the nature of the restoration sought, and unsupported claims that withdrawals were authorised do not displace the statutory moratorium and management-transfer framework. A direction to restore funds to the corporate debtor&#039;s account is described as valid consequential relief. A reference for action under an omitted provision concerning moratorium contravention is stated to be infructuous.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:11:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>