<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1846 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470724</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings arising from a loan and contractual transaction may be quashed where the allegations, even if accepted, do not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating or forgery. The notes state that the dispute involved repayment, an agreement to sell and dishonoured cheques, while the FIRs were filed after cheque-dishonour proceedings initiated by the accused and reflected a retaliatory pattern. Where criminal allegations merely give criminal colour to a substantially civil dispute and are instituted mala fide to pursue vengeance, continuation of the FIR and charge sheet constitutes abuse of process and warrants quashing under inherent jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 23:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1846 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470724</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings arising from a loan and contractual transaction may be quashed where the allegations, even if accepted, do not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating or forgery. The notes state that the dispute involved repayment, an agreement to sell and dishonoured cheques, while the FIRs were filed after cheque-dishonour proceedings initiated by the accused and reflected a retaliatory pattern. Where criminal allegations merely give criminal colour to a substantially civil dispute and are instituted mala fide to pursue vengeance, continuation of the FIR and charge sheet constitutes abuse of process and warrants quashing under inherent jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>