<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1502 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470729</link>
    <description>Appeals dismissed as time-barred may be restored for merits adjudication where binding and coordinate-bench decisions require comparable delayed appeals to be entertained. The notes state that the limitation dismissal was reconsidered in light of materially similar precedents, leading to condonation of delay, setting aside of the appellate order, and restoration of the appeal for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 23:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1502 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470729</link>
      <description>Appeals dismissed as time-barred may be restored for merits adjudication where binding and coordinate-bench decisions require comparable delayed appeals to be entertained. The notes state that the limitation dismissal was reconsidered in light of materially similar precedents, leading to condonation of delay, setting aside of the appellate order, and restoration of the appeal for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>