<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1502 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470729</link>
    <description>Dismissal of an appeal on limitation was reconsidered because binding and coordinate-bench decisions required appellate authorities to entertain materially similar delayed appeals on merits. The delay was condoned, the appellate dismissal was set aside, and the appeal was restored for adjudication on merits in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 23:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1502 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470729</link>
      <description>Dismissal of an appeal on limitation was reconsidered because binding and coordinate-bench decisions required appellate authorities to entertain materially similar delayed appeals on merits. The delay was condoned, the appellate dismissal was set aside, and the appeal was restored for adjudication on merits in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>