<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 682 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470723</link>
    <description>A Record of Rights entry carries a rebuttable presumption under the Land Revenue Code. The notes state that the presumption was displaced where the recorded occupant admitted entering the property through leaseholders, failed to establish an independent right or identify the basis of possession, and withheld the material lease deed. Interim injunction is described as an equitable discretionary remedy requiring lawful possession founded on an identifiable right and full disclosure of material facts. On the stated analysis, suppression of the lease arrangement and absence of independently established lawful possession defeated equitable protection, making the lower appellate court&#039;s injunction unsustainable and restoring the trial court&#039;s refusal of interim relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 19:01:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 682 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470723</link>
      <description>A Record of Rights entry carries a rebuttable presumption under the Land Revenue Code. The notes state that the presumption was displaced where the recorded occupant admitted entering the property through leaseholders, failed to establish an independent right or identify the basis of possession, and withheld the material lease deed. Interim injunction is described as an equitable discretionary remedy requiring lawful possession founded on an identifiable right and full disclosure of material facts. On the stated analysis, suppression of the lease arrangement and absence of independently established lawful possession defeated equitable protection, making the lower appellate court&#039;s injunction unsustainable and restoring the trial court&#039;s refusal of interim relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>